|
BOOKS DISCUSSSED IN THIS ESSAY:
The Language of Baklava
by Diana Abu-Jaber
Pantheon Books, 330 pp., $14.95 (paper)
Volcano
by Garrett Hongo
Alfred A. Knopf, 342 pp., $24.00 (hardcover)
Angela’s Ashes
by Frank McCourt
Scribner, 363 pp., $14.95 (paper)
Talking to High Monks in the Snow
by Lydia Minatoya
HarperCollins Publishers, 269 pp., $13.00 (paper)
Always Running
by Luis Rodriguez
Curbstone Press, 260 pp., $14.00 (paper)
Always remember you’re unique, just like everyone else – Kurt
Vonnegut
Something
about memoirists seems inherently off-kilter. What compels certain
people to write the story of their lives for thousands of strangers? And
why should the strangers care? Surely it’s not for the
integrity of nonfiction writing. Just ask James Frey. At
its best and most integral, memoir is truth bent through a prism. Who
remembers the details of a life faultlessly or without bias? Still,
knowing that memoir resides murkily in nonfiction’s basement
doesn’t answer the questions, “Why write it? Why
read it?”
And
maybe there’s nothing that does. But sometimes memories
of a life can grow so powerful they demand a corporeal existence, giving
a writer no choice but to provide one. And maybe, for some stories,
what’s more important than hard, unflagging facts is the truth
that can hide in the imperfection of experience. In her forward
to The Language of Baklava, Diana Abu-Jaber writes, “To
me, the truth of stories lies not in their factual precision, but in
their emotional core. Most of the events in this book are honed
and altered in some fashion, to give them the curve of stories.” There. Emotional
core. Reading a memoir is an invitation – and sometimes
a challenge – to sidle up to someone you don’t know and
get intimate.
Always relevant within the genre is memoir’s diverse child,
the ethnic memoir. Not only can its readers claim intimacy with
strangers, they can grapple with that ever-present dilemma called otherness. Sometimes
otherness rears up from the most desperate, neglected parts of society,
as in Luis Rodriguez’s Always Running and Frank McCourt’s Angela’s
Ashes. Often it drives the authors themselves into literal
journeys of self discovery, like Garrett Hongo’s in Volcano and
Lydia Minatoya’s in Talking to High Monks in the Snow. And
it can thankfully remind us of ourselves, as in Diana Abu-Jaber’s The
Language of Baklava. Otherness or not, the emotional core
remains an ever-present current throughout these stories, reminding
us how possible and imperative it is to understand each other.
Framed by the struggle the author faces to help his own son traverse
uncertain terrain toward a more secure future, Luis Rodriguez’s Always
Running is at once personal and implicating. “Criminality
in this country is a class issue,” he writes at the story’s
beginning, and then takes his readers into his abyssal days as a Mexican-American
gang member in Los Angeles. Published in 1993, Always Running emerged
when Americans were still raw from the outcome of the Rodney King verdict
and subsequent uprising; when rap artists were first bringing a glamorized
version of gangsta culture to the fore, to the thrill of middle class
kids everywhere. “If you came from the Hills, you were
labeled from the start … Already a thug. It was harder
to defy this expectation than just accept it and fall into the trappings,” Rodriguez
writes, inciting sympathy from readers whose past – or present – is
not written in this book. But underneath sympathy resides the
discomfiting realization that Rodriguez’s prose is laced with
fury, frustration and sadness. It seems to say, “If you
don’t know this, take a look. Because this is reality.”
A friend of mine, an English teacher in New Jersey, loves Frank McCourt’s Angela’s
Ashes because it is also the story of his childhood. He
grew up in a slum in New York City, in a one-room apartment with a drunk
or absent father, rags for clothes and constant hunger. To him,
McCourt’s book not only draws attention to a marginalized class – poor,
Irish – it gives him a place to go, uncomfortable as it is, where
he feels at home. Though an insistent innocence permeates throughout
McCourt’s book – it is told from the point of view of his
childhood self – a pervasive reminder that society often undermines
its poor lies beneath it. McCourt writes, “We’re ashamed
of the way we look and if boys from the rich schools pass remarks we’ll
get into a fight and wind up with bloody noses or torn clothes. Our
masters will have no patience with us and our fights because their sons
go to the rich schools and, Ye have no right to raise your hands to a
better class of people.”
|