The fans, nearly 20,000 strong and divided evenly between bright blue and crimson, took their seats for the kickoff with the restless anticipation that only a scoreless first half can produce. The ten-minute intermission had been just enough to shake blood into stiff knees and backs among the rooters crowded hip to hip on the wooden bleachers. They had barely enough time to mingle and speculate. A few fans tried to pick out the fairest of the “fair enthusiasts” wearing a sympathetic ribbon or, more brazenly, holding a pennant. Others may have fretted over their wagers. One in particular had bet that the Harvard Crimson would score on the first play, a boast that raised eyebrows among surrounding reporters. 

A cloudy, rainy week had blown out to sea the night before, scrubbing away any haze and leaving a starry sky behind. On that day, November 19, 1892, in Springfield, Massachusetts—neutral ground equidistant from the blue and crimson campuses—was clear and crisp. Perfect football weather.

The men in blue spread across the 55-yard line, ready for the start of play. Their corset-like jerseys were smeared with blood, grass and dirt; the cloth was heavy and their breeches sagged from sweat and rough play of the first half. Trafford, the captain of the Crimson, took the field among his team but within a few steps drifted away alone with the ball in his hands. He walked to within ten yards of the blue men, as close as he could go within the rules, and waited alone. The crowd stirred as the rest of the Harvard players split into two equal groups and lined up 20 yards behind him on either side of the field. They took their positions with the precision of a well-drilled military unit, letting their training take control over pain and fear. Their steps found a common rhythm as they pulled together for the start of play.

The crowd chattered, unsure of how to respond. Perhaps the boastful wagerer knew something that the rest of the crowd didn’t. In an era rich with trick plays, elaborate ruses and eccentric feints, the Crimson lineup looked different from anything that had come before. In 1892, few really understood football, and those who did understand the game’s essence tended not to agree on much about its specifics. It was ruled by the conflicting alliances of elite colleges and boys schools and resisted conformity and simple arithmetic. The rules changed radically from year to year and school to school. In the previous two decades, some schools had played with as many as 50 men on the field. As conventions developed, schools demanded that 15 players constituted a side, consistent with the way the English were developing their game of football. Only in the previous decade had the issue of the number of players been settled—most schools and clubs had agreed to reduce the combatants to 11 for each team on the field at any moment.

Time, however, was another matter. Sometimes the game went an hour, sometimes an hour and a half. Sometimes it was called because of darkness. Whole games had been played in which the ball moved little and was rarely seen by spectators. Teams disagreed on what exactly was the goal and how many points a team should get for it. Some believed that touching a ball down over the end line only won a team the privilege of kicking through the upright posts at either end of the field. Others, holding the more progressive view, thought the so-called touch-down to be the real aim of the game and that a player achieving one should be rewarded appropriately.

One thing was a simple constant of football, however, and it kept the crowd coming back. Play after play, men threw themselves into the awful machinery of the game. Not infrequently when the game’s massive piles of players were pulled apart, men would be laid out and have to be carried away. Another might stand and push his nose back into joint ready to rejoin the tangle of bodies. Some players specialized in vaulting over the protective phalanx of linemen and grabbing ahold of the ball carrier. One man was known for flying feet first at the heads and necks of the opposition. Those seated close to the action could hear the sounds of struggle—the smack of fists on vulnerable parts, the sudden whoosh of a man losing his wind under the crushing weight of his opponents, the foul language, the petty arguments. Of late, the rule makers had decided to let two men police the field, a referee and an umpire, one in charge of men and the other in charge of the ball, but disputes were common and sometimes the real police had to be called. Most in the stands and lining the field were confused—but compelled nonetheless. Football exposed something raw in human nature and offered the opportunity, some argued the illusion, for modern man to control it. On this day in Springfield, the crowd was double the size of the crowd that had cheered the same game only a few years before, which in turn was double the crowd that had cheered a few years before that. 

More >>